Claude training for the teams that read, write and decide for a living.
Claude is the AI assistant that is strongest where the stakes are highest: long documents, careful analysis and writing that has to sound like you. Tenders, contracts, reports and policy. Our workshop trains your team on it using their own real documents, run onsite in Perth or remotely Australia-wide.
What is Claude, and why train your team on it?
Claude is an AI assistant made by Anthropic. It stands out on long, dense documents and on writing quality, which makes it the strongest choice for tender responses, contract review, board reports and policy work. Training matters because that strength only shows up when people know how to work with it.
Handing someone a powerful tool is not the same as handing them a capability. The person who knows how to give Claude the whole document set, the evaluation criteria and last year's winning response gets work they can use. The person who types one line into a chat box gets what they asked for, and decides AI is not there yet.
What kind of work is Claude best at?
The document-heavy work that fills professional offices: reading a full tender pack and drafting the response, comparing contract versions, turning a month of numbers and notes into a clean report, and rewriting dense policy into plain language. Work where reading carefully and writing well are the whole job.
| The job | What Claude does |
|---|---|
| Tender responses | Reads the whole pack and drafts answers against the criteria, in your voice |
| Contract review | Compares versions and flags what changed, as a fast first pass for your people |
| Reports | Turns raw notes and numbers into a clean first draft |
| Policies and procedures | Rewrites dense documents into plain language your staff will actually read |
This is not theory for us. For tender-and-document teams who want proof, our JBP Consultancy case study shows what happens when decades of careful document method become working software.
Most AI demos are party tricks. Hand Claude a two-hundred-page tender pack and watch it draft your response section by section. That is not a trick, that is a week you get back.
Should you choose Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot?
For most teams ChatGPT is the all-rounder, and Copilot belongs in offices that run on Microsoft 365. Claude earns its place wherever the work is long documents and careful writing. Many businesses run more than one. We train on all three and will tell you straight which mix fits yours.
For document work specifically, the answer is short. Copilot is handy when the document already lives in Word and the change is routine. ChatGPT is fine for quick drafts and general questions. When the job is a full tender pack, a contract comparison or a report that has to be right, Claude is the one we reach for. The full side-by-side is in our ChatGPT vs Copilot vs Claude comparison.
Does the draft replace your experts?
No. Claude drafts and your experts decide. A contract comparison is a faster first pass for your people, not legal advice, and a tender draft still needs the judgement of whoever knows the client. The win is that your best people spend their time judging, not typing.
How the workshop runs
Built around the documents that eat your team's week.
Before: we collect the documents
We find out which documents eat your team's time, tenders, contracts, reports or policy, and build the workshop around those, not samples.
During: real documents, real drafts
Your team works Claude through one of their own live documents, learns to feed it context and criteria, and shapes its writing to your voice.
Everyone leaves with a working setup
A Claude workspace set up for their job, with reusable instructions they built themselves, ready to use on the next document that lands.
After: it keeps paying off
The skills stay with your team, so every tender, report and review from here on starts from a draft instead of a blank page.
Is our company data safe in Claude?
On business plans, what your team puts into Claude is not used to train the AI. We help you set the workspace up properly before the day, and the workshop covers simple rules for what should and should not go into any AI tool. Sensible habits, not fear.
Teams we've trained
One Perth operations team arrived doing everything by hand and left with three working automations built on their own live work. Document-heavy teams see the same shape: the first draft of a real tender response takes form in the room, before the day is out.
Common questions
We already use ChatGPT. Is Claude worth adding?
Often, yes, if your work is document-heavy. Many businesses run both: ChatGPT as the all-rounder and Claude for tenders, contracts, reports and policy. In the workshop we show your team where each one earns its place, on your own documents.
Do we need to be technical?
No. If your team can read a tender pack, they can learn Claude. The whole workshop runs in plain language on documents they already know inside out.
How long is the workshop, and what do we need to set up?
Workshops run in half-day or full-day formats, for groups of six to twelve, onsite in Perth or live remote Australia-wide. We send a short IT checklist beforehand, accounts provisioned and sample documents approved, so the day itself is all document work.
Where do you run it?
We run workshops in person and remotely, for teams across Australia, from our base in Ardross in Perth.
Updated 6 July 2026
Related
Buried in tenders, contracts and reports?
Tell us which documents eat your team's week, and we will run a workshop where they put Claude to work on the real thing. In plain language, with no pitch.